In [case], a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on the servient land, there was no interference with their reasonable use of their land.
Answer
Hair v Gillman (2000) 80 P & CR 108
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
In [case], a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on the servient land, there was no interference with their reasonable use of their land.
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
In [case], a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on the servient land, there was no interference with their reasonable use of their land.
Answer
Hair v Gillman (2000) 80 P & CR 108
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Hair v Gillman (2000) 80 P & CR 108, a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.