The comments made on s 62 in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of Payne v Inwood (1996) 74 P&CR 42. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of [case], where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later explained as being an exception to the general rule that prior diversity is required; an exception that applies specifically to rights to light.
Answer
Broomfield v Williams [1987] 1 Ch 602
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
The comments made on s 62 in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of Payne v Inwood (1996) 74 P&CR 42. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of [case], where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later explained as being an exception to the general rule that prior diversity is required; an exception that applies specifically to rights to light.
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
The comments made on s 62 in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of Payne v Inwood (1996) 74 P&CR 42. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of [case], where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later explained as being an exception to the general rule that prior diversity is required; an exception that applies specifically to rights to light.
Answer
Broomfield v Williams [1987] 1 Ch 602
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of Payne v Inwood (1996) 74 P&CR 42. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of <span>Broomfield v Williams [1987] 1 Ch 602, where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later explained as being an exception to the general rule that prior diversity is required; an exception that applies s
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.