Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Tattooing/Personal Adornment
Tattooing and body piercing form another exception.
[ case ] FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that there was no logical difference between this type of branding, tattooing, body piercing, and similar personal adornments, which is a lawful activity. This case forms an interesting contrast to the decision and dicta in R v Brown
Answer
R v Wilson [1997] QB 47 (CA)

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Tattooing/Personal Adornment
Tattooing and body piercing form another exception.
[ case ] FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that there was no logical difference between this type of branding, tattooing, body piercing, and similar personal adornments, which is a lawful activity. This case forms an interesting contrast to the decision and dicta in R v Brown
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #defences #law
Question
Tattooing/Personal Adornment
Tattooing and body piercing form another exception.
[ case ] FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that there was no logical difference between this type of branding, tattooing, body piercing, and similar personal adornments, which is a lawful activity. This case forms an interesting contrast to the decision and dicta in R v Brown
Answer
R v Wilson [1997] QB 47 (CA)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Tattooing/Personal Adornment Tattooing and body piercing form another exception. R v Wilson [1997] QB 47 (CA) FACTS: The defendant used a hot knife to brand his initials onto the buttocks of his wife, at her request. He argued consent to a charge under the OAPA 1861, s 47, and was successful. HE

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.