Put differently, why is Derrida’s essay so docile in the face of Paul’s texts, even if this docility functions in the service of criticizing Paulinism as a discourse of (both) veiling and unveiling which—precisely —must be eluded as part the old epoch of “truth as onto-logical revelation” (83)? Derrida’s is here the same laziness or dogmatism we noted in Althusser’s text, a laziness or dogmatism—we should never forget—which is simply the obverse of the (initially) self- protective gesture of Breton as ecclesiastical gatekeeper of Paulinism
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
cannot see any pdfsSummary
status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
---|
last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
---|
started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
---|
Details